« Tales from the Apple IStar Store | Main | Two Questions for the Universe »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453b27e69e200d83457b6a769e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference On Public Art and Semi-Private Jokes:
» Gates from SIVACRACY.NET: Siva Vaidhyanathan's Weblog
Via the NYT Via Rox Populi... [Read More]
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Isn't it a $24M semi-private joke?
Posted by: Eli | 15 February 2005 at 14:09
The Daily Show bit last night about the gates was funny too. The make us look at the whatness of our whereness ... recontextualize and reimagine what we know ... for instance, I had to recontextualize what I thought I knew about what $21 million dollars could be used for ...
Posted by: erobin | 15 February 2005 at 14:22
It is their private money. Who cares how they spent it?
Posted by: ALAIN | 15 February 2005 at 18:37
Yeah, the Daily Show bit was priceless. Or maybe worth $24M.
I personally think it's cool. It's a temporary thing, and I lament that it will be gone by the time I get back to NYC on business in early March. Oh well, I'll still visit my art director friend at DC, so I'm sure I'll get plenty of nifty Batman and other free comix! That's way cooler than anything Cristo can come up with.
Posted by: NTodd | 15 February 2005 at 19:50
I think spending that much money on art is just fine. That money could be going to weapons of war, whereas all but one of Christo's installations have never killed anyone.
But statements like It is their private money. Who cares how they spent it? rub me the wrong way, because they betray ignorance of basic economics. Private money does exist, but it''s not very useful except in certain limited situations, and none of it is in US dollars.
Posted by: Chris Clarke | 24 February 2005 at 14:58