What did you know and when did you know it?
It is just me or are political operatives working in the White House even supposed to have access to top-secret information with regard to intelligence gathering and foreign policy? So, the BIG QUESTION is ... WHO TOLD KARL ROVE?
I'm very glad to see your online magazine's responsible journalists are asking the tough questions. Follow the money.
Posted by: NTodd | 02 July 2005 at 15:52
They pulled the story off your first link! Those scoundrals!
But you're right. The main question is, which nominee for UN Ambassedor informed him.......
Posted by: Rook | 03 July 2005 at 02:34
Wouldn't Rove, as the Mayberry Machiavelli architect, have information like that ready to hand in the first place? If not, Cheney certainly would.
Posted by: Elayne Riggs | 03 July 2005 at 13:02
Well, I'm not the first to think this, but is it just a coincidence that the White House is giving everyone such a hard time about releasing Bolton's stuff? Wasn't he the Undersecretary for Arms Control? Hmmm, I wonder if HE would have any info on which CIA operatives would be working on WMD and Nuclear intelligence stuff. Seems to me he has a track record of getting bent out of shape when people decide to not bend the data to suit the administrations wishes too. Probably just a coincidence... ya think?
Posted by: Scott1960 | 03 July 2005 at 13:32
Yeah, I think the people pointing to Bolton have a good point.
Posted by: Amanda Marcotte | 03 July 2005 at 14:12
If Karl Rove may have committed treason in a time of war, why is he still given access to the White House and the President? Even his attorney doesn't dispute that he spread the information around - the only question is when. The Secret Service needs to yank his access now.
Maybe we should all celebrate Independence Day by asking why a traitor is still working in the White House.
Posted by: Morgaine Swann | 04 July 2005 at 01:10